FEM Thermal Analysis

FEA Thermal Analysis is at the heart of what we do here at our Singapore offices at BroadTech Engineering.

As a professional CFD company, when solving thermal engineering problems encountered during CFD consulting, our FEA simulation engineers can utilize the use of a wide range of solving solutions such as

Finite element analysis (FEA)
Finite different approaches
1D Thermal networks
Thermal analysis of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation solutions.

Over here at BroadTech Engineering, we focus our CFD consulting services on FEM thermal analysis techniques that are employed in conjunction with Structural FEA simulation analysis and CFD services.

Product goals of Superior Built quality and Cheaper cost have a strong influence on design investments. At the same time, these goals Are Also often Conflicting, so balancing them is complicated/Hard.

Product Advancement teams in Advanced Fatigue Analysis Services Companies Teams need ways to Perform Technical Design trade-off Analysis to Comprehend the Long Term Impact of Engineering design Choices on both costs and Built quality. Expenditure in Engineering Product design Software tools can help provide this Design insight, empowering Engineering development teams to make better decisions/Choices.

Where do FEM Thermal Analysis Fit in the development process?

Managing these Typical Operational Limitations while allowing Product Design to continue to Stay Highly Cost competitive is now Actually Achievable. Siemens PLM provides Extremely Long Term scalable FEA Structural Analysis Features, including Solid Edge software Simulation Modeling, a 3D CAD-embedded Software solution for Mechanical design Consultants, and Femap FEA Software Tool with NX™ Nastran Solver, a Totally standalone Engineering Design solution for FEM Simulation engineering Consultants who require more Highly Professional FEA analysis Software Tools and Techniques.

Respondents from Several Finite Element Analysis Companies were Demanded to pick the top two. All of the post-processing Confrontations are related to the Devastating amount of data Included and the time required to review it. FEM Stress Analysis Enterprises need better ways/Means to work with the results more efficiently Analyse them. Adding to the Hours Needed, the FEA Piping Engineering results are not in a format that is meaningful to management and more time must be taken to put the results in format management can consume

Discover FEA Simulation to Bring further Advantages.

“Beyond cost reduction, FEM Thermal simulation Allows Finite Element Analysis Enterprises raise the bar on their Flagship products. FEA Consulting Engineering Simulation can help FEA Simulation Services Enterprises Obtain better insight and understanding of the physical behavior of their products than testing ever could. It also enables them to innovate, Enabling them the freedom to test Brand new Design concepts with Greater Faith. Whether they are Advancing for weight, material reduction, and cost or testing Totally new innovative concepts, early Font-loaded FEA simulation Services Allows Producers explore and learn from more Product design iterations.”

What makes Siemens PLM Femap FEM Simulation Software Very Special is that it is Highly independent operationally. It doesn’t have a particular solver Dependency and it isn’t Locked with a Specific 3D CAD Modeling program. It Is able to Operationally Work with them all. And when you Require to Quickly create and Visualize your Very own 3D Design geometry from scratch, that’s where Femap really shines. Femap is an engineer’s pre- and post-processor. When Product engineers Urgently Require to get Reliable FEA Structural Analysis results, Precisely and competently, they use Femap FEA Simulation Software. It’s Professional industrial-strength and Highly Reliable.

The similarity between Structural and Thermal Modeling

When importing Into CAD Geometry into CAE Nonlinear FEA Software, some Model geometry may not Convert perfectly; this can cause Tremendous Difficulties with the FEA Structural analysis. Identifying these Challenging spots consumes a lot of time, and was Graded by 44% as a top challenge In Several cases, the geometry cannot be fixed and must be recreated which duplicates efforts and wastes valuable time.

The extension from a structural FEA simulation solution to a thermal FEA modeling solution is quite a natural progression as there are direct similarities between them

Variable involved we are solving for (Linear Displacements is replaced by Temperatures)
Input Terms in the Matrix equations that we are building (Stiffness is changed to Thermal conductivity)

Femap FEA Software Solution is based on an advanced set of Open-sourced Software analysis technologies that Allow it to Function simply and Conveniently within customer engineering simulation Product Development environments. Femap Finite Element method Software Tools leverages Parasolid software, a widely Trusted solid modeling kernel used in CAD/CAM/CAE systems to Generate and Modify the mathematical definition of engineering parts and assemblies. In addition, Femap Finite Element Method FEA Software Tools supports a number of other types of CAD systems, enabling it to interface with 3D CAD geometry from virtually any source, directly and seamlessly. Femap also works Seamlessly with a broad range of finite element (FE) solutions from several types of FEA solvers. This makes Femap FEA Finite Element Analysis Software Solution a logical and flexible solution that is simply Customized for even the Highly demanding Client Requirements

FEA Software Key features

Accurate noise and vibration diagnostics with Professional Technical Analysis Assistance from FEA modal, grid, panel, energy, and path contribution FEA Analysis Using the Finite Element Method FEA Software
During a Pipe Stress Analysis, the Professional Structural Engineer performing the FEA Stress Analysis Services are Capable to Accurately Map test data and predecessor simulation data – multibody, electromagnetics (EM), computational fluid dynamics (CFD) – onto the vibro-acoustic Simulation model, including time-to-frequency domain conversion for Receiving realistic Loading Values
The Nonlinear FEA Software Include frequency response function (FRF) and modal Modeling for Structure components in assembly context using Both Numerical simulation Modeling or Theoretical Testing data
Include acoustic Translation vectors (ATV) or vibroacoustic transfer vectors (VATV) Modeling representations for acoustic or vibroacoustic components, which are Re-cyclable for multi-load case scenarios for Stress Engineering & powertrain noise or Passenger cabin wind noise

The Simcenter Femap NX Nastran Distinctive advantage

A premier FEA Modeling Software solver Regarded by Leading FEA Analysis Companies and Leading Vibration Consultancy as an industry standard for Well over The Past 40 Years, Femap Nastran Software is a finite element ( FEA) Physics solver for Engineering stress, vibration, structural failure, Thermal heat Flow, acoustics and aero-elasticity Analysis.

Commercial Manufacturers, FEA Consultancy Offering Fatigue Failure Analysis Services and engineering Contractors in aerospace, automotive, Industrial electronics, heavy machinery, medical equipment, and other industries rely on Simcenter Femap Nastran software for their Important Structural engineering Numerical Computational Demands so they can produce safe, reliable and Highly optimized Engineering designs within ever shorter Engineering design Development cycles.

Overview

1. FEA Consulting

2. CFD Consulting

3. LS-DYNA Consulting

About Us

BroadTech Engineering is a Leading Engineering Simulation and Numerical Modelling Consultancy in Singapore.
We Help Our Clients Gain Valuable Insights to Optimize and Improve Product Performance, Reliability, and Efficiency.

Questions?

Contact Us!

Please fill out the form below. Our friendly customer service staff will get back to you as soon as we can.

1. Powerful ANSYS FEA Simulation Software Tools

2. FEA Consultants with Extensive Research & Professional Experience

3. FEA projects Completed in a Timely and Cost-effective Manner

4. Proven Track Record

5. Affordable

6. Full Knowledge Transfer

Call Us for a Free Consultation

Discover what FEM Thermal Analysis can do for your simulation project today by calling us at +6581822236 for a no obligation discussion of your needs.
If you have any questions or queries, our knowledgeable and friendly consultants will be happy to assist and understand more about your simulation needs and requirements

Alternatively, for quote request, simply email us your detailed specifications & requirements to info@broadtechengineering.com

Important Considerations when Performing FEM Thermal Analysis

1. Conduction Considerations

Thermal Conduction of heat happens when there is a temperature difference across the length of a component.

Factors that affect the amount of thermal heat energy transferred includes

Amount of Temperature Differential
Thermal heat energy will flow from the hotter region to the cooler region.
The larger the temperature differential the more thermal energy that is being transferred
Component material Cross-Sectional Area
The bigger the component cross-sectional dimension, the more the thermal energy that is being transferred
Thermal conductivity of Component Material
How well material is able to conduct Thermal energy depends on its Thermal conductivity which is an inherent material property. In general, a metal material (eg. Copper) is able to efficient at conducting more thermal heat energy than non-metal (eg. Ceramics)

2. Forms of Convection Heat Transfer

Convection heat transfer from a body surface happens by the movement of the adjacent fluid, such as gas or a liquid medium, where the warmer fluid is usually transported away from the surface and replaced with a cooling fluid.

The actual heat transfer mechanism of the fluid motion is relatively complicated in nature where it involves Localized conduction of thermal energy transfer which is made possible by a fluid boundary layer at the surface

Convection heat transfer relies on fluid motion, whereby the thin fluid layer adjacent to the body surface circulates away from the body surface and is immediately replaced by a fresh layer of cooler fluid.

This Convection heat transfer is dependent on the function of a number of factors such as

The temperature difference between the surface and the free fluid
Area of Heat transfer Surface
Value of the material Convective heat transfer coefficient

Basic Forms of Convective Heat Transfer

There are two basic forms of Convective Heat Transfer

Free Convection
In free convection scenario, the fluid is initially in a stationary condition. Fluid circulation starts when there is an occurrence of local thermal heating.
*Notes that the orientation of the thermal heat transfer surface relative to the direction of the gravity force also makes a difference in the convection heat transfer. If a surface is vertically positioned, the effects of gravity can help in encouraging fluid circulation. However, if the body surface is horizontally orientated, gravity does not help in heat circulation.
Forced Convection
In a Forced convective heat transfer, the adjacent fluid is being entrained to move along by some external driving force. An example of such a setup includes having a fan blowing across a body heat transfer surface. This assists in providing a more energetic driven medium for the fluid to move away from the heated surface.
*Note that as the Computation of the actual convective heat transfer under forced conditions is generally more complex, a coupled Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) analysis can be used to give an accurate simulation model.

3. Radiation Calculations

The mechanism of Radiation heat transfer involves the emitting of electromagnetic waves or energy photons from the body surface of the heat source. This mechanism does not need a medium to pass through, thus allowing radiation to occur in a vacuum.

*Note that in theory, any surface which has a temperature above 0° is emitting thermal heat energy via radiation heat transfer.

At any given point in time, a typical surface is both emitting and absorbing thermal energy via radiation heat transfer with an adjacent body surface.

Factors influencing whether a specific body surface is experiencing a net cooling or heating effect includes

Emissivity and Absorptivity of the material surface properties
The angle of the photon transmission path in relation to the body surface.

View factor

The view factor is a parameter that is determined by the effective view a Panel A surface has on Panel B. This Effective view controls the travel path of the energy photons between two panels.

In practice, it can be very challenging to calculate for arbitrary surfaces, without some kind of actual ray tracing solution.

Non-Linearity

Heat transfer is dependent on a fourth-order temperature term. This means that any heat transfer analysis including radiation effects becomes a nonlinear solution.

Four Types of Analysis Solutions

1. Linear Solutions

In a Linear analysis solution, the material thermal properties stay constant is not dependent on time or temperature.
Also for Linear solution scenarios, it is required that there is no radiation heat transfer and no presence of other nonlinear physical effects.
*As the default solution setting defined in most CFD simulation software solvers is usually nonlinear, it can sometimes be administratively confusing to define a linear solution during the initial setup of the simulation.

2. Nonlinear Solutions

In a nonlinear simulation modeling, where radiation is present, most simulation parameters involved can fluctuate with temperature variations.
Such physics parameters with nonlinearity properties can include

1. Material Thermal properties

This includes Thermal conductivity, Convective Heat transfer coefficient

2. Thermal boundary conditions

3. Thermal Loading conditions

This includes externally applied heat flux from a thermal heat source which is a function of temperature. It is important to note that a Nonlinear analysis solution requires an incremental loading approach whereby the Total thermal loading is broken down into successive steps.

3. Steady-State Thermal Analysis

The steady-state condition in a thermal event happens when the thermal temperature distribution and all thermal energy flows are stabilized and remain relatively constant over time.
The steady-state analysis can be easily derived by carrying out an energy balance calculation which assumes a stabilized condition.
Often times such Steady-state conditions are key for deriving the temperature distribution over component, which is then used as an input parameter to perform structural stress analysis.

4. Transient Thermal Analysis

In the Transient Thermal analysis the initial conditions are defined and then an incremental time stepping solving approach is implemented out base on the thermal loading and thermal boundary conditions.
The simulation calculation can be carried out through to a steady-state thermal condition, or to evaluate initial thermal shock loadings, for instance where the steady-state thermal analysis condition is not the primary concern.
One of the considerations in the transient thermal analysis, which is in many ways analogous to a transient dynamic analysis, is an accurate calculation of the time step required.

Stability Criteria

This time step requirement can be established by the Stability criteria, either automatically by the simulation software solver or manually controlled by the end-user.

Adaptive Time Stepping

The Adaptive time stepping feature included in many simulation solvers can optimize the time step by accounting with such as

1. Variations in Rate of change in Thermal effects for example which is dominant at the beginning of the analysis

2. The occurrence of Nonlinearity in Thermal effects which requires fine time steps.
Note that it is not advisable to have a Time steps with a granularity coarser than the stability limit.

5. Thermal Strain Loading in a Stress Analysis

In many cases, the main objective of FEM thermal analysis is to provide insights into the thermal temperature distribution for use as input in a subsequent stress analysis.
In a typical uncoupled thermal and structural simulation modeling, a steady-state temperature distribution is mapped from the thermal model to the structural model.
Mapping can either be direct mapping within the same physical mesh or interpolated between dissimilar mesh models. In either case, both mapping approach will result in thermal strains throughout the structure.

Thermal strain values vary proportionally to the change in temperature from initial conditions and are influenced by the value of the thermal expansion Coefficient.

Free Expansion – Zero Stress

If a physical component subjected to a uniform change in temperature is allowed to expand freely, it will result in a uniformly constant thermal strain throughout the component and result in Zero stress.

Restrained Expansion – Thermal Stress

when a component subjected to thermal expansion is secured at 2 points, the component is physically restrained from expanding naturally.
This mechanical strain results in Thermal strain and Thermal Stress which has a relatively more complicated thermal distribution & Mechanical boundary conditions.

Regardless of whether a Temperature dependency of a specific material is linear or nonlinear, the Material structural properties can still allow for a linear static simulation modeling and steady state thermal heat transfer.
A nonlinear static solution may need to be adopted if the thermal heat loading exceeds the Linear structural responses. In many cases, this involves occurrence of regions of material non-linear plasticity, or Physical geometric effects such as large displacement, buckling or mechanical contacts
Experienced judgment is needed here to determine whether a fully coupled solution should be adopted whereby both thermal nonlinearity and structural nonlinearity are constantly updated throughout the duration of the FEM Thermal simulation analysis.

Accuracy & Applicability FEM Thermal Analysis Solution

FEA simulation methodology has a certain level of inaccuracies as it fundamentally involves the discretization of a continuous response.
As the temperature distribution obtained from the thermal analysis is used as input for subsequent structural analysis
It is important to evaluate the sensitivity of that structural simulation analysis to inaccuracies in the thermal distribution.

Structural Analysis

The observable physical response in the Structural analysis is based on Displacement field.
Assessment of the accuracy of a Structural analysis is determined by analyzing the jump in stress values between adjacent elements and attempt to achieve a convergence.

Thermal Analysis

The observable thermal response in the Thermal analysis is based on temperature distribution, which is typically presented as a contour plot.

Heat Flux

The distributions of heat flux passing through each element are able to give us a better sense of the thermal analysis solution compared to the use of temperature distributions.
Heat flux convergence is better than a smooth temperature contour plot as an indicative guide to Accuracy and Convergence because it is similar to the stress convergence in a structural solution.
In mesh refinement analysis, the singularity is retained, but its effect is suppressed, and the overall accuracy of the heat flux distribution, is vastly improved.

Types of Boundary condition for use in Simulation Analysis

1. Application of Physical Mechanical constraints

– Relatively more severe

2. Application of equivalent pressure loading

– Base on boundary stiffnesses or contact surfaces

– Relatively less Harsher

Challenges of Analysis

Although FEA Thermal analysis solutions are relatively straightforward to set up, there are some inherent challenges involves in such analysis, such as

1 Achieving the required result accuracy

2. Accuracy of idealization methods

3. Accuracy of Mesh discretization

Types of Heat Transfer

Fundamentally there 3 Modes of heat transfer methods that we have to consider

1. Conduction Heat Transfer

Heat transfer equations: Q = K A (Tupper – T lower)/L
where
Q = Heat
K = Thermal Conductivity
A = cross-sectional area
Tupper = Temperature at Hot region
Tlower = Temperature at Colder region
L = Path Length

2. Convection Heat Transfer

Heat transfer equations for Natural & Forced Convection from Surface: Q = h A (Tsurface – Tfree)
Q = Heat
h = Convection Coefficient
A = surface area
Tsurface = Temperature at surface
Tfree = Temperature in free stream

3. Radiation Heat Transfer

Heat transfer equations q = ε σ (T4 surface)
q = Heat Flux
ε = Emissivity
σ = Stefan-Boltzmann Constant
T4 surface = Temperature at Surface
The physics of each of these and implications for the FEA solution are discussed in turn.